Everybody but you has said that the terrorist addition is excessive. Geo Swan, a quick glance down this discussion page shows you behaving in an authoritarian and dictatorial manner. May i also say that while i agree with you Harlequin and geoswan- regarding the ridiculousness of detaining people for owning a popular watch - i hardly think that it holds objectivity enough to justify the extensive entry. I suggest re-locating the terrorist part to its own page, with a link from this page. it is interesting, and could warrant its own entry, but has little to do with the watch itself. I agree that the information on the terrorist link is excessive. Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirka80286 ( talk So much so, that he has to be featured in the first paragraph. I'm not exactly sure how the fact that the Mexican president has one, is relevant to the watch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |